Your depths of field were really successful this week especially in the last image. You also did a good job mixing different design techniques and not just focusing on one. I would definitely keep challenging yourself to do that more.
You have really nice contrast in all of your images, photo 9 is the least contrasted in comparison to how highly contrasted the other photos are. I see most of the design elements, except for symmetry and balance.
Images feel really dynamic (nice, dramatic angles and shallow depth of field). The composition in image number 7 feels off, but I'm not sure why. I also think maybe tat image should have been taken from an angle that shows just a little more light along the silhouette of the subject.
Your texture and repetition-focused photos are working really well in this series. You were able to capture these at successful angles and you increased the contrast in the photos to a perfect amount. Some of the other photos were a bit blurry, however, and while the shallow depth of field effect is nice, I can't quite see which elements you were trying to capture in those photos (3, 5, & 10).
I am not sure what elements are supposed to be in the tenth photo. The first photo seems to have good contrast with the black background. It could maybe use a bit more white than gray though. It was good you started to find distinguishable subjects like in 5 and 7. I agree that the 7th photo feels off. Perhaps its the gray rectangle that attaches into the subject.
The compositions all seem very strong and tend to utilize multiple design principles in some. The use of lighter contrast values in the 9th photo would strengthen the composition if it did not take away from the texture.
The contrast in photo 5 is very strong. I cannot clearly identify which design principle is used in photo 10. Overall, your compositions are very well constructed.
Your depths of field were really successful this week especially in the last image. You also did a good job mixing different design techniques and not just focusing on one. I would definitely keep challenging yourself to do that more.
ReplyDeleteYou have really nice contrast in all of your images, photo 9 is the least contrasted in comparison to how highly contrasted the other photos are. I see most of the design elements, except for symmetry and balance.
ReplyDeleteImages feel really dynamic (nice, dramatic angles and shallow depth of field). The composition in image number 7 feels off, but I'm not sure why. I also think maybe tat image should have been taken from an angle that shows just a little more light along the silhouette of the subject.
ReplyDeleteYour texture and repetition-focused photos are working really well in this series. You were able to capture these at successful angles and you increased the contrast in the photos to a perfect amount. Some of the other photos were a bit blurry, however, and while the shallow depth of field effect is nice, I can't quite see which elements you were trying to capture in those photos (3, 5, & 10).
ReplyDeleteI am not sure what elements are supposed to be in the tenth photo. The first photo seems to have good contrast with the black background. It could maybe use a bit more white than gray though. It was good you started to find distinguishable subjects like in 5 and 7. I agree that the 7th photo feels off. Perhaps its the gray rectangle that attaches into the subject.
ReplyDeleteThe compositions all seem very strong and tend to utilize multiple design principles in some. The use of lighter contrast values in the 9th photo would strengthen the composition if it did not take away from the texture.
ReplyDeleteThe contrast in photo 5 is very strong. I cannot clearly identify which design principle is used in photo 10. Overall, your compositions are very well constructed.
ReplyDelete